Why Organizational Departments Often Clash: Insights and Solutions
Written on
Chapter 1: The Internal Strife of Organizations
Many employees in large organizations can attest to the pervasive dislike that often exists between departments, leading to elaborate passive-aggressive tactics aimed at undermining each other. Ironically, these actions can harm the organization as a whole.
Organizations often have a tendency to prioritize their own departmental needs over the collective good, creating a hostile environment.
Section 1.1: The Common Targets
Finance departments often become the focus of resentment, as there's seldom enough budget allocated for other departments. Legal departments may respond to crises with silence, leaving Public Relations and Investor Relations to fend off negative press. Human Resources may impose mandatory training sessions, all in the name of legal defense. Meanwhile, the I.T. department often defaults to the classic solution: rebooting the system.
Subsection 1.1.1: The Case of Intel
At Intel, the world leader in chip manufacturing, new CEO Robert Swan initiated the “One Intel” program to encourage employees to take risks, focus on customer needs, and enhance collaboration across departments. Historically, tensions between chip designers and manufacturing teams have reached alarming levels. Yet, CEO Swan's efforts to unite the company showcase the challenges in fostering teamwork amid entrenched rivalries.
Section 1.2: The Reality of Organizational Silos
It’s telling that a CEO must rally significant resources to encourage collaboration among departments, highlighting that organizations often resemble a collection of competing fiefdoms rather than cohesive entities. According to a recent American Management Association (AMA) survey, 83% of executives acknowledged the presence of silos in their companies, with 97% noting their detrimental effects.
Chapter 2: The Case of IBM
When Lou Gerstner took the helm at IBM in 1993, he faced a multifaceted crisis. The company's decline was fueled by external challenges like poor customer service and pricing issues, but internal factors—such as departments competing for clients and withholding information—were equally damaging. Gerstner emphasized the need to address these internal conflicts and famously remarked that “the last thing we need is a strategy.”
Video Description: Discover the contentious relationships between game companies that often lead to intense rivalries and corporate sabotage.
The second video title is 10 Gaming Companies That HATE Each Other - YouTube.
Video Description: Explore the fierce competition and animosity among gaming companies, revealing the impact on their operations and collaborations.
Kafka's Insights on Bureaucracy
Departmental conflicts aren’t exclusive to private corporations; governmental agencies often showcase similar dysfunction. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has struggled with internal strife for years. In June 2014, a criminal investigation was launched into the VA, revealing a “corrosive culture” that hindered effective care for veterans.
Dysfunction is also prevalent at the United Nations, where a lack of clear organizational structure hampers collaboration and mission effectiveness. An independent review highlighted that administrative failings were obstructing peacekeeping efforts, further complicating the bureaucratic landscape.
Section 2.1: Understanding Silos
An AMA survey indicated that 83% of respondents identified turf wars within their organizations. Although many employees blame upper management, these silos emerge from the very structure of organizations. Each department operates under its own manager, yet all units depend on one another for overall success.
Problems arise when departments fail to share priorities or information, leading to conflicting objectives that can adversely affect customer service and employee morale. For example, a finance department focused on cost-cutting may overlook the repercussions on product quality or customer satisfaction.
Breaking Down Barriers
To effectively dismantle the issues arising from silos, the focus should be on addressing the problems they create rather than eliminating them entirely. Silos can foster accountability and responsibility; however, the keys to overcoming their challenges lie in cooperation, communication, and collaboration.
Human nature often drives individuals to excel within their own departments, sometimes at the expense of the organization as a whole. Thus, it’s crucial to connect these silos rather than attempting to eradicate them. Chris Fussell, in his 2017 book One Mission: How Leaders Build a Team of Teams, advocates for a shift from hierarchical thinking to network-based structures.
Reflecting on my own experience in a Fortune 30 corporation, I found that transferring managers between departments fostered understanding and collaboration. After time spent in accounting and public affairs, I returned to human resources with a renewed appreciation for my colleagues in different areas.
In the words of Henry Ford, “Coming together is a beginning, staying together is progress, and working together is success.”