Why Isaac Newton's Toad Vomit Remedy for the Plague Failed
Written on
Chapter 1: The Illustrious Legacy of Sir Isaac Newton
Throughout history, numerous individuals have made significant contributions to science, but few have had as lasting an impact as Sir Isaac Newton. Even after nearly three centuries, his legacy endures. However, not all of his ideas were accurate. A particularly misguided belief was his notion that the vomit of deceased toads could serve as a remedy for the bubonic plague.
Born in 1642 in England, Newton experienced a privileged upbringing despite the early death of his illiterate farmer father. After his mother remarried a wealthy clergyman, he received a comprehensive education, displaying a notable talent for science and mathematics. Although he was bullied as a child due to his smaller stature, he became deeply engrossed in his studies, often isolating himself from peers.
During his illustrious career, Newton formulated the theory of gravity, perhaps his most recognized achievement. He also pioneered calculus, invented the reflecting telescope, and made significant advancements in chemistry. Holding esteemed positions and publishing extensively, he frequently shared his insights on various subjects.
Despite his brilliance, some of Newton's theories were less than stellar. This is exemplified by his peculiar notes on a proposed remedy for the plague, which were both unpalatable and scientifically unfounded.
In 1665, a plague outbreak forced Newton to leave Cambridge and seek refuge at his family's home. Upon returning to the university in 1667, he became engrossed in researching the illness. His notes from this period outlined a bizarre remedy involving toads and their vomit. He suggested that the cure could be achieved by suspending a toad by its legs in a chimney for three days, prompting it to “vomit up earth with various insects” before it died. The dried remains would then be ground into powder and mixed with the vomit to create “lozenges” intended to be worn on the skin of those afflicted, who experienced painful blisters. Newton asserted that this concoction would “drive away the contagion and [draw] out the poison.”
However, Newton's approach was neither unique nor effective. During the 16th and 17th centuries, several physicians believed in the healing powers of dried toads. His ideas stemmed from the work of Belgian physician Jan Baptist van Helmont, who wrote De Peste (On Plague). According to Martha R. Baldwin’s 1993 article in the Bulletin of the History of Medicine, van Helmont posited that placing an amulet made from dried toad near the infection could transfer the creature's fearful energy to the patient, thereby expelling the disease.
Newton also proposed additional enhancements for his toad remedy, suggesting that amulets crafted from amber, sapphires, or hyacinth could achieve similar effects. Nevertheless, he maintained that the toad solution was the most effective.
It wasn't until 1896 that effective plague treatments were discovered, and they did not include toads or vomit. While Newton’s theories were certainly misguided, they remind us that successful scientists are willing to accept their mistakes. Their relentless quest for knowledge is built on a foundation of empirical evidence, rather than wishful thinking.
Section 1.1: Newton's Plague Research
Newton's extensive research into the plague reflects his dedication to understanding the world around him.
Subsection 1.1.1: The Origins of Toad Remedies
Section 1.2: The Evolution of Medical Understanding
The journey toward effective plague treatments underscores the importance of scientific progress and critical thinking.
Chapter 2: Lessons from History
In analyzing the past, we are reminded that the pursuit of truth often involves navigating through errors and misconceptions.