# Navigating the Double Standard: Female Founders and Leadership
Written on
Chapter 1: The Leadership Divide
In the startup world, male founders are often lauded for their proactive leadership. In contrast, their female counterparts frequently encounter severe criticism that can jeopardize their careers when they adopt a similar approach.
When Paul Graham released his essay on "founder mode," it initiated a significant discussion on two contrasting leadership styles for scaling companies. Founders can either establish a complex management hierarchy, distancing themselves from daily operations, or remain intimately involved in every aspect of their business. While many male entrepreneurs and investors embraced the "founder mode" concept, it exposed an unsettling reality for female founders: a double standard that restricts their ability to lead like their male peers without facing intense scrutiny.
Section 1.1: The Double Standard in Focus
For women at the helm of their companies, the experience of being in "founder mode" is fraught with unique challenges. Male leaders who exhibit hands-on, intense management are often viewed as visionary or bold. Conversely, when female founders take the same approach, they are frequently labeled as toxic or overly demanding. Many female entrepreneurs navigate a landscape where even minor missteps can result in career-threatening repercussions from boards or the media.
Amanda E/J Morrison, CEO of Julie Products, a healthcare firm focused on emergency contraception, expressed her frustration with this double standard. "You could deliver every result in the world, and they'll still find the one thing you didn't do," she stated, drawing a stark comparison to Adam Neumann, the controversial WeWork founder, who received funding despite his prior issues.
Sophia Amoruso, the original #Girlboss and founder of Nasty Gal, echoed this sentiment on Twitter, stating, "For men, it's called Founder Mode, and it's celebrated. For women, it's called 'toxic.'" Whitney Wolfe Herd, founder of Bumble, also shared her experience, revealing that she faced daily attacks during her decade in founder mode.
Subsection 1.1.1: The Cultural Expectations
Morrison recalls her business school experience, where being deeply involved in operations was viewed negatively. She was told, "'You're not giving people space to do their jobs, you're a micromanager.'" However, Graham's essay posits that a hands-on approach can be a company's secret weapon—a notion Morrison agrees with, yet struggles to implement in practice.
When her head of retail left earlier this year, she took on those responsibilities herself, believing it was in the company's best interest. Despite her instincts, she faced skepticism and resistance from investors and peers, a common challenge for female founders who must continually justify their decisions in ways that male founders do not.
Section 1.2: The Balancing Act for Women Leaders
Being heavily involved in operations and making tough decisions is part of the role, but these actions often come under harsher scrutiny for women. Christie Horvath, founder of Wagmo, a pet care coverage startup, noted that female leaders are expected to embody nurturing and empathetic qualities, which may not always be compatible with the difficult choices that come with leadership. For instance, her decision to bring leadership back to the office faced backlash, yet ultimately benefited the company.
Chapter 2: The Risks of Leadership
As founders increasingly reclaim control, a trend has emerged where companies, especially those that grew too quickly during the tech boom, are eliminating middle management in favor of more streamlined operations. However, for female founders, this shift carries significant risks.
The fear of being disliked can feel like a career-ending misstep for women. Several female founders shared with Business Insider how the media quickly crafts "takedown" stories when female leaders make unpopular choices. Sara Mauskopf, CEO of Winnie, a startup focused on childcare solutions, admitted she avoids giving harsh feedback on Slack, worrying it could be misused against her.
While male founders like Elon Musk and Adam Neumann often receive second chances from investors after negative media coverage, female founders face a different reality. "With female founders," Mauskopf explained, "it usually ends with the press cycle. That's it for them. They're never heard from again."
Ty Haney, founder of Outdoor Voices, is working to break this cycle. After being ousted from her company due to negative press, she is now launching a new startup, Try Your Best, which has already secured over $10 million in funding. Haney praised Graham's essay, admitting her biggest regret was allowing others to dictate her decisions. She emphasized that part of leadership is being comfortable with not being liked—a particularly challenging aspect for female CEOs.
Key Takeaways:
- Female founders grapple with a double standard: Male founders are often celebrated for their engaged leadership, while female founders face accusations of being "toxic" or "demanding" for similar behaviors.
- Women in leadership roles encounter additional scrutiny: Female founders like Amanda Morrison and Christie Horvath shared experiences of resistance when taking direct control of business operations, even when necessary for success.
- Career consequences are more severe for women: Unlike male founders who receive second chances, female founders risk their careers over a single misstep.
Chapter 3: Video Insights
In the first video, "Fundraising Advice from Female Founders," experts discuss the unique challenges female entrepreneurs face in securing funding and navigating the startup landscape.
The second video, "The Real Reason Female Entrepreneurs Get Less Funding | Dana Kanze," delves into the systemic issues that contribute to the funding disparity between male and female founders, offering insights on how to address these challenges.