Gothic Chemistry: An Unexpected Impact on "Frankenstein"
Written on
Chapter 1: The Influence of Science on Gothic Literature
Mary Shelley and her husband, Percy Shelley, were deeply engaged with Sir Humphry Davy’s Elements of Chemical Philosophy (1812) during the creation of Frankenstein. In her introduction to the 1831 edition, Mary recalls countless late-night discussions with Lord Byron and their friends about the interplay of science and the supernatural. These conversations, along with her vivid dreams and contemplations, gave rise to one of the most compelling and lasting myths in modern literature: the tale of Frankenstein.
Section 1.1: Understanding Davy's Work
What makes Davy’s book remarkable? It presents a surprisingly contemporary take on chemistry while also reading as a fine piece of literature. At the time Davy was writing, the concept of a "scientist" was still being formed. To grasp chemistry effectively, Davy learned French to access the groundbreaking work of Lavoisier, a key figure in the field. Not only was Davy an esteemed chemist, but he also possessed a talent for poetry. His writing reflects an era when science was transitioning from philosophical roots and was still heavily dependent on language.
Subsection 1.1.1: The Literary Qualities of Chemistry
Davy’s book includes a comprehensive and intriguing history of scientific thought, tracing its evolution from ancient times to the 19th century. This historical context was customary in scientific writing of that period. His work is rich with extensive readings across various disciplines, blending scientific inquiry with insights from the humanities.
Section 1.2: The Modernity of Davy's Chemistry
When examining his views on chemistry, especially the technical aspects, Davy’s approach can be seen as strikingly modern. Many concepts he discussed would fit seamlessly into contemporary chemistry textbooks, albeit with different terminology. However, there are notable exceptions. Davy, like other scientists of his time, viewed light, heat, and electricity as substances in their own right rather than as properties of materials. Additionally, distance was conceived as an inherent characteristic of objects—a fascinating detail that highlights the profound differences between 19th-century perspectives and our current understanding.
Chapter 2: The Evolution of Scientific Thought
In contemplating the historical progression of scientific categories, it’s evident that the principles we now regard as fundamental were not always seen in the same light. This realization prompts a deeper exploration into how our understanding has evolved over time, challenging the notion of timeless axioms in science.