# Enhancing Urban Education by Fostering Teacher Retention
Written on
Chapter 1: The Importance of Teacher Retention
The core objective of education is to enhance student achievement. While various initiatives aim to optimize this goal, many policies inadvertently create challenges that hinder teacher retention. In cities like Nashville, underperforming schools struggle to maintain teacher staff throughout the academic year. It's not uncommon for educators to leave mid-semester, resulting in students being taught by long-term substitutes who may not effectively deliver lessons. This situation fosters an environment of instability where students face a revolving door of teachers, making it difficult to establish a supportive and successful school culture.
Imagine a student navigating 13 years of this constant change. Many find themselves fortunate if they encounter the same teacher for an entire year, often instead facing long stretches with ineffective substitutes. Each academic year brings new administrators and educators, which can lead to an unpredictable and unsafe atmosphere regarding rules and expectations.
Before we become overly fixated on standardized test scores and academic metrics, it is essential to prioritize the creation of stable and secure school environments. I propose that focusing on teacher retention is vital to achieving this stability, and urban education policymakers should design initiatives with an emphasis on how they impact teacher retention from one year to the next.
Section 1.1: Unintended Consequences of Current Policies
The prevailing belief that enhancing student outcomes requires improving teacher quality through rigorous evaluation systems may be flawed. Urban educators often find themselves subjected to continual observation, evaluation, and extensive professional development. While it seems logical that such measures would refine teaching practices, the over-reliance on these assessments raises questions about their actual effectiveness. Are we truly measuring teacher effectiveness? What does teacher effectiveness even entail?
A recent study by RAND Corporation on teacher effectiveness found no significant improvements in student performance linked to the implementation of stringent feedback and mentorship systems.
The "Intensive Partnerships for Effective Teaching" initiative, backed by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, aimed to enhance student outcomes by providing greater access to effective teaching. Schools involved adopted various measures of teaching effectiveness, including assessments of teacher performance and their influence on student achievement.
Three school districts and four charter management organizations participated in this initiative, which underwent a six-year evaluation. Key findings from this evaluation revealed:
- Participants successfully implemented measures to evaluate teaching effectiveness and used these evaluations in various human resource decisions.
- All sites developed observation rubrics to establish a shared understanding of effective teaching and invested time in training observers.
- Despite these efforts, the initiative did not significantly improve student achievement or graduation rates, especially among low-income minority students.
Several factors may have contributed to the limited success of this initiative, including incomplete implementation, external policy influences, and insufficient time for outcomes to manifest.
In summary, even when we attribute meaning to test scores, demonstrating a significant impact of school administrators on teacher effectiveness remains a challenge.
Section 1.2: The Stressors Affecting Teacher Retention
Two critical issues are evident: urban education faces a retention crisis, and the rigorous evaluation systems in place create undue stress for teachers. Many educators have exited schools due to these pressures, and numerous seasoned teachers base their job decisions on whether their schools enforce these systems.
In addition to the burdens of demanding professional development, teachers are often encumbered by excessive licensure requirements. Despite a lack of evidence supporting the notion that advanced degrees improve teaching capabilities, many states mandate additional qualifications. This process can be both costly and time-consuming without enhancing teaching effectiveness.
For instance, acquiring my own teaching license could amount to approximately $8,500—excluding the countless hours spent fulfilling requirements—for a position with a salary of $43,000, which is significantly below the city’s median income. For recent graduates encumbered with student loans, such financial burdens can make sustaining a career in education increasingly challenging.
For those without a genuine passion for teaching, entering or remaining in the field may seem impractical, especially for individuals with transferable skills.
Districts struggling with teacher retention should contemplate easing professional development and licensure requirements. Such adjustments would likely not harm student achievement and would facilitate the path to becoming and remaining a teacher. The funds saved from reducing professional development expenses could be redirected toward initiatives that genuinely enhance school culture and safety, such as hiring additional social workers and counselors.
These changes alone won't solve the teacher retention dilemma, but they represent a positive step forward. Policymakers must carefully evaluate the negative repercussions that existing programs may have on urban teacher retention.
Chapter 2: Building a Stable School Culture
A robust school culture is essential for any educational system. Without ensuring that students can rely on consistency from their schools, the goal of helping them achieve higher academic standards becomes increasingly elusive.